Shopify Theme Customization Scope Template

Theme customization is where scope creep quietly kills margin.

Clients say “just a few changes,” but those changes usually touch:

• multiple templates (home, collection, product, cart)
• new sections/components
• app-driven constraints (subscriptions, reviews, bundlers)
• performance trade-offs (scripts, images)
• device/browser QA

A good theme customization scope isn’t a list of screenshots.

It’s a set of deliverables with boundaries:

• what templates are touched
• what components are built
• what the QA standard is
• what’s excluded
• what triggers a change request

Below is a copy/paste scope template you can use in Google Docs.

If you want it to assemble from inputs (templates touched, component count, app stack complexity, etc.), RuleDox can generate a near-complete theme customization scope draft inside Google Docs.

Assemble a theme scope in Google Docs → https://ruledox.app/live-demo

---

• Shopify agencies doing iterative storefront improvements
• Teams delegating scoping and wanting consistent boundaries
• Projects where the site stays on Shopify but the theme/UI evolves

• Full redesigns/rebuilds (use a store build scope)
• Projects with undefined requirements where discovery is the deliverable

---

If you want “theme customization” to mean something, define:

1. Baseline theme + environment
2. Templates in scope
3. Components/sections in scope
4. Apps that constrain UI
5. QA and acceptance standard
6. Change rules

---

Client: [Client name]

Project: Shopify theme customization

Current theme: [Theme name + version]

Online Store 2.0: [Yes/No]

Primary goals:

• [e.g., improve PDP UX and increase conversion]
• [e.g., update collection filtering and merchandising]
• [e.g., refresh homepage layout and storytelling]

• Current theme codebase and version will be used as baseline
• Customizations will be implemented in [staging theme] before publishing
• App stack constraints will be respected; conflicts may require change requests

3.1 Templates in scope

List templates explicitly. Example list:

• Home
• Product (PDP)
• Collection (PLP)
• Cart
• Content pages: [About, FAQ, etc.]

Templates not listed are out of scope.

3.2 Components/sections in scope

Define what will be built/modified. Examples:

• new homepage hero section with [X] variants
• product media gallery updates
• trust badges / USP bar
• collection toolbar (sorting/filter UI)
• cart drawer updates

For each component, define:

• where it appears (template)
• state variations (mobile/desktop, logged-in, sale, etc.)
• what “done” means

3.3 Styling system decisions

• typography updates (font choices, scale)
• spacing system (tokens/variables)
• color usage and accessibility considerations

3.4 App impacts (named apps)

Apps must be named to be in scope.

In-scope apps affecting UI:

• [Subscriptions app]
• [Reviews app]
• [Bundler app]

Deliverable includes:

• UI alignment for app widgets where feasible
• configuration changes required to match design

3.5 Performance considerations

Unless explicitly agreed, performance work is limited to:

• avoiding obviously harmful additions (unbounded scripts, massive images)
• basic image and asset hygiene

If performance targets are required (e.g., CWV targets), define them explicitly and treat as a separate workstream.

3.6 QA and testing

Agency QA includes:

• Responsive checks (mobile/tablet/desktop)
• Latest Chrome/Safari/Firefox
• Template-specific functional checks (add to cart, variant selection)
• App widget sanity checks

Client QA includes:

• content accuracy
• approval of layout and design direction

Unless explicitly listed in “In-scope deliverables,” the following are excluded:

• full redesign or net-new theme build
• custom app development
• replatforming or backend system changes
• complex performance optimization / CWV targets
• SEO strategy beyond basic on-page hygiene
• ongoing monthly support (separate retainer scope)

• Client provides access to Shopify admin and relevant app accounts
• Client provides brand assets and content updates where required
• Approvals returned within [X] business days
• Scope inputs remain stable; changes follow change request process

• Week 1: discovery + baseline review + component list finalized
• Week 2–3: build + iteration
• Week 4: QA + launch

A change request is triggered by:

• additional templates/components beyond the in-scope list
• new apps/integrations introduced mid-project
• major design direction change after approval
• requirements discovered that require custom app development

Change requests require written approval with timeline and cost impact.

---

Fix: screenshots are references; deliverables are components + behaviors + acceptance.

Fix: name apps early and include an explicit “app constraints” note.

Fix: define browsers/devices and what flows must be tested.

Fix: define change triggers and stick to them.

---

Theme customization scopes are repeatable, but only if the variables are explicit.

RuleDox assembles the scope from inputs (templates, component count, app stack) so:

• the right inclusions/exclusions appear every time
• scoping can be delegated without quality drift
• hours/pricing logic (if used) stays consistent

Assemble a theme scope in Google Docs → https://ruledox.app/live-demo

---

• Store build scope: https://ruledox.app/content/shopify/shopify-store-build-scope-of-work
• Performance optimization scope: https://ruledox.app/content/shopify/shopify-performance-optimization-scope
• CRO sprint scope: https://ruledox.app/content/shopify/shopify-cro-sprint-scope
• Retainer scope: https://ruledox.app/content/shopify/shopify-retainer-scope

---

A theme customization scope is usually narrower than a website redesign scope of work.

A redesign scope often includes discovery, new template definition, and broader UX changes. Theme customization is typically iterative work on an existing theme with a bounded list of templates/components.

If the work starts to require new templates, major UX re-architecture, or a full visual system reset, treat it as a redesign and scope it separately.

Bound the scope by templates/components and define revision limits + change triggers. If a request changes the component list materially, it’s a new scope.

Only if you’re willing to scope and price for it. Otherwise, keep it to hygiene and make explicit that performance targets require a separate workstream.

Yes. OS 2.0 changes how sections/templates are structured, but you still need the same scoping anchors: templates, components, apps, QA, and change rules.